Login Form

DX Cluster

2121
18079.9
W3LPL
KH2L
2121
14274.0
KM4SII-@
IK4LZH
2121
14076.0
LU2BB-@
R7RIB
2121
28480.1
N4IQ
VP6EU
2121
3638.5
R2FBT-@
UE23DSA
2121
28480.1
PY6TS
VP6EU
2121
28480.0
KD0AEF
VP6EU
2121
3707.0
SV8RYJ-@
AO5ANT
2121
3730.0
EA4EUY
EA4EUY
2120
14280.0
W1HS
IZ4JUK
2120
21026.0
N2TU
TX5T
2120
14217.0
PY4KP
S56B
2120
28480.1
N4IQ
VP6WU
2120
14260.0
VA6YC-@
QRM
2120
18140.0
VE7CUP-@
W5OU
2120
7105.0
SV1AVS
RA6ADQ
2120
10103.0
K9GL
T77C
2120
10119.0
OK1NU
LU1YT
2120
14016.0
W3LPL
ZB2TT
2120
14267.0
KM4SII-@
SV2CXI
2119
7007.0
W3LPL
TA1PB
2119
28420.0
WA6SCW
CX8DS
2118
14267.0
N9ITB
SV2CXI
2118
3767.0
EB1ASA
HB9HLM
2118
1838.0
JA3SWL
RU3XK
provided by DX Summit

News

Fractal Antennas, Hype or Hope

By Dan Romanchik, KB6NU

 

QRZ.Com currently has a very interesting item on fractal antennas (http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=277623). While the idea of applying fractals to the design and construction of antennas has been around for quite some time, very few hams have actually built them, and there are currently no companies building commercial fractal antennas for the ham radio market. The question, of course, is why?

Those that are hyping fractal antennas—most notably W1YW, CEO of Fractal Antenna Systems—claim several advantages. These advantages purportedly include wider bandwidth and smaller size when compared to traditional antennas, such as verticals and dipoles. Those that are trying to debunk these claims contend that this is all just hogwash, and that there's no real scientific basis for these claims.

One thing that's confounding this debate is that there have been very few articles published on the topic. For commercial reasons, W1YW has made his articles unavailable. He says that he will be publishing something real soon now, but there is nothing definite at this point.

There is at least one article on the Internet that describes the construction of a fractal antenna for amateur radio use. "FYI:FYQ: Another look at the Fractal Quad Yagi" (http://www.scribd.com/doc/18788401/FYIFQY) was published in the October 1999 issue of 73 magazine. It describes the construction of a two-element, 10m antenna. Like most 73 articles, it's not incredibly technical, though, and doesn't really contribute to the technical debate, except to demonstrate that physically small antennas can be made using fractal design.

The PDF contains several photos of the antenna. It's a crazy contraption that looks relatively difficult to build. So difficult, in fact, that it makes me wonder if it's even worth it to try building one. After all, 10m antennas are not really all that big or all that difficult to build to begin with.

Even more interesting than the antennas are the personalities on both sides of the debate. The QRZ.Com discussion quickly devolved into a flame war, with neither side scoring a knockout.

Personally, I think the brouhaha is much ado about nothing. It seems to me that it's been demonstrated that you can build antennas using fractal design techniques. They are physically smaller than traditional antenna designs, but you really don't get something for nothing. Overall, they don't have as much gain as yagis or quads, and they're more complex to build.

My opinion on this is that if W1YW can build antennas that radiate a signal and can sell those antennas to someone, then more power to him. In the end, his company will live and die by how well, his antennas work and how much they cost when compared to antennas from other companies.

As for me, I think I'll stick with the more traditional HF antennas. If I need to make my antennas smaller, I'll use loading coils or designs such as the Moxon. I may not be on the bleeding edge of technology, but I'll certainly avoid a lot of headache trying to figure out who's right.

=======================

When not avoiding flame wars on QRZ.Com, Dan, KB6NU, operates CW on the HF bands, writes and publishes license exam study guides, and teaches ham radio classes. You can find his ham radio blog at www.kb6nu.com.

Solar Data

23 Feb 2017 2049 GMT
SFI: 83
SN: 17
A Index : 10
K Index : 3 / No Report
X-Ray : B1.0
304A : 114.9 @ SEM
Ptn Flx : 1.49e-01
Elc Flx : 4.30e+01
Aurora :  3 / N = 1.99
Mag (Bz) :  7.2
Solar Wind : 556.2 km/s
Band
Day
Night
80M - 40M
Poor
Fair
30M - 20M
Fair
Fair
17M - 15M
Poor
Poor
12M - 10M
Poor
Poor
Geo-Magnetic Field : UNSETTLD
Noise : S2-S3
foF2 : 7.4
Solar Data provided by hamqsl.com